oops!

November 13, 2006

i’m so angry i could die

here’s another reason why i’m afraid of going back to singapore permanently:

say i married this guy, and things are fine for a couple of years but are gradually going downhill. i’ve lost interest in him and think that i’m much better off being divorced or separated, we don’t really talk much, we don’t have sex much because i’m just no longer attracted to him.

he’s frustrated, obviously. but maybe he feels that the marriage is worth saving. or maybe he doesn’t. i’m just hypothesising here.

one day, maybe intoxicated maybe not, he comes home and initiates sexual intercourse because y’know sometimes we just do have sex. it’s a physical urge that needs to be dealt with, and who else better to do deal with it than someone you share a house with. anyway, i refuse, he gets angry and insists. i refuse some more, he forces himself on to me and has penetrative sexual intercourse with my body.

i haven’t consented at all, and the act of sexual intercourse was done under duress/threat/physical force. but still, i can’t be classified as a rape victim because he’s my husband.

-+-+-+-+-+-

the consultation paper on the proposed changes to the marital rape section of the penal code purports to have made the amendments in response to the ‘changed status of women and the evolving nature of a marital relationship’.

well, if the status of women in singapore is such that a man can rape a women because they are married and not separated or have protection orders existing or other injunctions pending, then this clearly shows that women have no rights over their body once they have entered into a marital relationship.

do i belong to my husband? am i a will-less chattel whose use is entirely up to my owner? just because i’m married and we have a marriage certificate does that mean i stop being myself and become part of my husband? do i not have rights and independence?

i refuse to be owned or belong to anyone. and i do not see how the act of marriage can imply a continuous consent to sexual intercourse because it clearly doesn’t - just because you agree to have sex with someone today, doesn’t mean you want to or agree to the next. if both parties consent, then go ahead; but if one party doesn’t give consent, then respect that decision and go wank off by yourself. any supposed implied consent is just a false construction of reality.

if they want to make rape within a marriage an exception to the general laws of rape, why don’t they just change all the other laws to do with women and their marital status and their inability to be independent contracting parties. from now on, why don’t they just legislate that women can’t own property unless their husbands are co-owners. and women can’t sign contracts without their husbands. and, oh yeah, women shouldn’t be able to vote either, because we have no mental capacity to think anything apart from what our husbands tell us to.

a very large number of women are raped by people they know or who are close to. and whether or not that person is the women’s husband shouldn’t even figure in the equation as long as there was penetrative sexual intercourse without consent. rape is rape is rape. there shouldn’t be any exceptions to the rule, and to go one step further, it really should be gender neutral.

how can i return to a place that doesn’t legally protect me from what would probably be the most traumatic experience as a woman? rape, not just by a stranger, but by someone you trust and love (in some way), and by someone who shares the same house as you, whom you see everyday, and who knows all your intimate habits. if the law refuses to protect me, who else can i seek protection from? the person who committed the rape?

how am i going to bring up daughters in singapore and teach them self-respect and self-worth, dignity and independence, when i have to tell them as well that the government and the law doesn’t give a rat’s ass about their welfare once they’re married.

-+-+-+-+-+-

perhaps the best alternative, as a woman, is to not get married and merely live with a partner. cohabitation gets a bad rep, but at least it’ll save you from being classified as a martial rape exception.

5 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://dolcelatte.blogsome.com/2006/11/13/im-so-angry-i-could-die/trackback/

  1. …also, with around 18 women out of the 85 members of parliament, you’d think that at least one of them might raise an objection to the continuing subjugation of women within marriage….

    Comment by sweetmilk* — October 14, 2006 @ 3:32 pm

  2. and they don’t understand why more and more graduate women choose not to get married. Ha!

    in tangentially related news, they raised the GST.

    Comment by Han — November 14, 2006 @ 7:52 am

  3. jiejie. i miss you. :(
    and yes. i hate the gahmen. keep raising gst. as if i print money at home. and as my friend said, its a regressive tax, so it is so not helping the poor. hello. the gahmen needs to study econs again, they are obviously failing to see simple concepts.
    when are u coming home!
    and yeah, i just read about the pathetic changes they made to the law. like its of any use. where’s the dignity and basic rights that women should be having. what stupid lack of insight do they have! omg. whats up with such victorian laws. even england ABOLISHED the law 16 years ago. ABOLISHED. but no. singapore jus decided to adjust, change, tweak the law. sigh.

    Comment by ju — November 14, 2006 @ 12:52 pm

  4. even the malay birth rate dropped… in singapore the men don’t want to marry because of the financial implication upon divorce due to the woman’s charter. the woman don’t want to get married because they would have given up rights to their body… (hey, that’s the price of 50% of all the husband’s assets in perpetuity post divorce…fair trade?)

    uniquely singapore

    Comment by loupgarou — December 8, 2006 @ 8:31 am

  5. Here is the problem.
    Fascist America, in 10 Easy Steps
    By Naomi Wolf, Chelsea Green Publishing. Posted April 28, 2007.
    Alternet.org
    http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/51150/

    Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
    By Linda Wade - Apr 26th, 2007 at 2:12 pm EDT
    Democrats.org
    http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/lcwade/CLkW

    Now who actually wrote the original article?
    http://hunterseeker.wordpress.com/

    Comment by hunter seeker — April 28, 2007 @ 9:25 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.